Search by Topic / Keyword...
pedsortho.com
(702) 333-7000
1 Breakthrough Way, Las Vegas NV 89135
4425 S. Pecos Rd. Ste. 6, Las Vegas NV 89121
Topic:
Issue:
Category:
Research
Title:
Study Characteristics and Impact of Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America Annual Meeting’s “Best Papers” From 2009 to 2019
Author:
Marquez, Guillermo MD; Granger, Caroline MD; Cline, Justin A. MD; Goldfarb, Charles A. MD; Wall, Lindley B. MD, MSc
Journal:
Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics
Date:
April 2024
Reference:
44(4):p 286-290, DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002607
Level Of Evidence:
# of Patients:
54
Study Type:
Retrospective review
Location:
Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA) annual meeting abstracts and publications
Summary:
Analyzed the characteristics, publication rates, and impact of "best papers" from the POSNA annual meeting. Tracked abstracts to peer-reviewed journal publications to determine their influence on pediatric orthopaedics.
Methods:
Retrospective review of abstracts from POSNA's website and subsequent peer-reviewed publication via PubMed searches. Recorded data on publication rates, time to publication, levels of evidence, journal impact factors, Hirsch Index of authors, and citations.
Exclusions:
Abstracts not published in peer-reviewed journals or lacking matching details for cross-verification.
Results:
Publication rate: 72% (39/54) in peer-reviewed journals across 17 journals. Average time to publication: 21.2 months (range: 0–121 months). Common journals: Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics (26%) and Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (23%). Median authors: 4 for abstracts, increasing to 6 for publications. Average journal impact factor: 4; average citations: 41 (range: 0–270). Most abstracts were Level III studies.
Conclusions:
Most "best papers" at POSNA are published in high-impact journals within 2 years, with significant contributions to pediatric orthopaedic surgery. The publication rate was higher compared to some other orthopaedic societies. Highlights the strong academic and clinical relevance of selected "best papers."
Relevance:
Limitations:
Perspective: